A Liberal Response to Europe’s Population Decline

Abstract 

Europe’s population decline presents not just a demographic challenge but a strategic threat to the continent’s economic vitality, political stability, and global competitiveness. This paper offers a liberal response to the crisis, arguing that demographic sustainability requires more than technocratic fixes it demands values-based, future-oriented policy. From reforming family support and pension systems to investing in education, digital infrastructure, and regional cohesion, the paper advocates for a European Demographic Pact and the appointment of a dedicated EU Commissioner. A liberal strategy must combine individual freedom with shared responsibility to ensure the continent remains innovative, inclusive, and resilient in the face of rapid population ageing and outmigration. A liberal strategy must connect individual freedom with shared responsibility in order to ensure that the continent remains innovative, globally competitive, and resilient in the face of rapid population ageing and internal migration within the Union. 

Keywords: Sustainability, Responsibility, Liberal strategy, Strategical solutions, Commissioner for Demography, European Demographic Pact 

Introduction

In 2022, Europe reached a demographic turning point. That was the year when the continent’s population peaked. In continental Europe (based on geographical borders), the population reached 748 million, (United Nations, 2024), while within the European Union, it peaked at around 448 million (Eurostat, 2023). Since then, a gradual decline has begun, driven by natural population loss (low birth rates, ageing), which migration can only partially offset.  

There are multiple, interconnected causes behind the declining birth rate. Economic factors include difficulties in accessing housing for young people, unstable labour market conditions, and the high cost of raising children. Among the social and cultural factors are the postponement of family formation, the growing participation of women in the workforce, the transformation of traditional gender roles, the spread of individualised urban lifestyles, and shifting societal values. Together, these elements lead many people to have fewer children – or none at all. A growing number of women and families envision a life with only one child, or even child-free, as a legitimate and preferred life path. 

The economic and social impacts of the demographic crisis

The demographic crisis is not merely a social phenomenon; it represents a strategic threat to Europe’s long-term economic vitality, political stability, and global competitiveness. As population decline accelerates, the EU faces structural fault lines that are often underestimated in public discourse yet are central to the continent’s geopolitical resilience. 

The shrinking working-age population is already destabilising the European labour market (European Commission, 2021b). Key sectors such as healthcare, logistics, agriculture, and advanced manufacturing are experiencing an acute shortage of skilled workers, especially in regions suffering from continuous outmigration of young people. While automation and artificial intelligence may partially offset these shortages, they do not offer a universal solution. 

At the same time, pension systems across EU Member States are approaching the limits of sustainability (OECD, 2023). Traditional pay-as-you-go schemes are coming under significant financial pressure due to the rising old-age dependency ratio. In the near future, governments will be forced to choose between raising taxes, reducing pension benefits, or increasing public debt, each of which would have serious political and economic consequences if not accompanied by increased productivity. 

The demographic decline also reduces innovation potential. Fewer young workers means fewer entrepreneurs and researchers, and less adaptive capacity overall. The Draghi Report emphasises that countries experiencing a decline in their young populations will become less competitive in a rapidly evolving, technology-driven global economy (European Commission, 2024). A well-educated, mobile, young workforce could be one of Europe’s most valuable strategic resources – if the EU manages to harness their potential. However, Southern and Central European Member States lag significantly in offering innovation opportunities, and existing programmes and business environments often fail to provide young people with the chance to succeed in their home countries. In the worst-case scenario, these young people will not only leave their nations but also may eventually leave the EU altogether. 

In parts of Eastern and Southern Europe, demographic decline has already resulted in visible depopulation (ESPON, 2020). School closures, reduced hospital capacity, and deteriorating infrastructure are turning these regions into ‘social deserts’ – economically stagnant and politically vulnerable. The outmigration of young, skilled workers is especially damaging. It not only hinders local development but also undermines the EU’s internal cohesion. 

Depopulating border regions on Europe’s periphery also pose geopolitical risks. In the context of Russian influence, hybrid warfare, and the rise of populist trends in Eastern Europe, demographic erosion is no longer just a welfare issue – it is a matter of internal security. Ageing societies are more prone to institutional inertia, generational tensions, and the rise of identity-based politics. As the electoral majority ages, public policy tends to focus on short-term preservation over long-term investment. This dynamic contributes to growing disillusionment among younger generations and further fuels emigration. Moreover, demographic anxiety can lead to deeper social polarisation, especially around issues of migration, identity, and national belonging. The rhetoric of ‘population decline’ is already being weaponised by populist political forces, often embedded in civilisational or ethno-nationalist narratives. If liberal democracies fail to present a credible and coherent demographic policy, they risk ceding the field to illiberal discourses. 

Liberal responses to Europe’s demographic crisis

The problem of population decline is not merely a technocratic policy challenge; it is a deeply value-driven and political one, forcing Europe’s liberal political forces to rethink their relationship to the role of the state, personal freedom, community life, and human capital. Across several regions of the continent, political movements advocating authoritarian or nationalist approaches to demographic decline are becoming increasingly vocal, employing rhetoric centred on the ‘duty to reproduce’, the rejection of migration, or the reinforcement of traditional gender roles.  

The first step is to rethink family policy – not as a political instrument, but as a partnership in ensuring long-term societal sustainability. Rather than seeking to increase birth rates through financial incentives or cultural pressure, the liberal approach prioritises the freedom and dignity of parenthood. This means ensuring that everyone has the option to choose whether or not to have children without facing economic vulnerability, social exclusion, or institutional obstacles. Key to this are affordable, high-quality childcare services, reformed maternity and paternity leave that promotes gender equality, and flexible working arrangements that allow for a genuine balance between professional and family life. Housing policy and urban planning must also adapt, with a focus on family-friendly spaces and housing models that enable younger generations to start their lives independently. 

Liberal political forces must also reclaim the topic of family and family policy from populist actors in the political discourse. Family planning based on respect for human dignity is one of the great achievements of European liberal democracies, with deep roots in the continent’s social history. This legacy must not be ceded once again to authoritarian or semi-fascist regimes that seek to monopolise the meaning of family for ideological ends. 

Education is the key

Empowering the younger generation through education is another cornerstone of a liberal demographic strategy. Europe’s future strength lies not in the size of its population but in the aggregate capabilities of its people. While Europe is home to some of the world’s top universities and highest-quality education systems, it is clear that the continent has fallen significantly behind the United States in the global competition, especially in online education and related technologies (García-Herrera & Porcaro, 2021). Although precise statistics are lacking, it is evident that European universities educate far fewer students online worldwide compared with their American counterparts. This is a missed opportunity. European higher education institutions could deliver useful programmes for lifelong learning, particularly in developing countries and regions affected by migration. In doing so, they could also gain a competitive edge over the United States. 

Within the EU itself, the education system must be universal, high-quality, and tailored to the challenges of the future, regardless of a student’s social background. Essential measures include the development of early childhood education, the reform of vocational and technical training, and the integration of digital skills into all curricula. Special attention must be given to young people who are not in education or employment (the so-called NEET group), as they represent a key risk group for social and economic exclusion (Eurostat, 2024). 

Mobility and exchange programmes such as Erasmus are valuable but insufficient. They currently serve a relatively narrow demographic – mostly from upper-middle-class or elite social backgrounds. A genuinely inclusive liberal strategy must extend these opportunities to all young people, regardless of their starting point in life. 

Reducing regional disparities

Reducing regional disparities is also a prerequisite for demographic sustainability. The liberal approach rejects the notion that such regions are beyond saving or that the future lies solely in the continued expansion of urbanisation. Instead, what is needed is a smart cohesion policy that does more than provide financial compensation to affected areas – it must proactively and innovatively intervene in the trends of demographic decline. 

One key component of this approach is the development of digital infrastructure. In the twenty-first century, geographical location should not be a barrier to economic participation – provided that the necessary technological conditions are in place. High-speed internet access, smart devices, and the availability of digital services make it possible for people to participate in the labour market, take up remote work, start businesses, or access education from small towns, rural areas, or even outside the EU’s borders. Digitalisation can bring jobs back to these communities while also fostering new forms of community life. 

A second strategic area is the targeted support of young families and entrepreneurs. Demographic renewal can only be successful if attractive living conditions are offered to those willing to settle, raise children, or start a business locally. This may include housing subsidies, the development of education and healthcare infrastructure, tax incentives, or even social innovation programmes (European Commission, 2023a). The goal is not to force people to return but to create an environment where settling down becomes a rational and appealing choice. 

Reducing regional disparities

A liberal demographic strategy begins with the recognition that ageing is not merely a budgetary or labour market challenge; it can also be an opportunity, provided older generations are actively included in economic and social life. The liberal approach does not seek to compel everyone to work longer but instead aims to create the conditions for those who are willing and able to remain active – on a fair, flexible, and supported basis. 

Gradual and flexible retirement is a cornerstone of pension reform. In more and more countries, models are emerging that allow individuals to exit the workforce based on their personal life circumstances and health status rather than a fixed age threshold.¹ This not only alleviates pressure on pension systems but also helps avoid the psychological and social shocks often associated with sudden inactivity. 

Promoting cooperation between generations in the workplace not only enhances productivity but also strengthens social cohesion. When younger and older employees work together, they can learn from one another: older colleagues share their experience, while younger ones contribute digital fluency and innovative thinking. This dynamic requires ensuring older employees can access modern skills development, especially in digital competencies, so they are not left behind by technological change. 

European Demographic Pact

A liberal, European-level demographic policy does not aim for uniformity, but it does assume shared responsibility: to respond to the demographic crisis in a coordinated and coherent manner. This makes it urgent to establish a comprehensive framework – not to challenge national sovereignty, but to strengthen coordination and the sharing of knowledge and best practices. One of the central proposals that liberals could champion is the creation of a European Demographic Pact,² which would clearly define the goals, indicators, and priorities needed to ensure the EU’s long-term demographic stability. 

Following the logic of the green and digital transitions, this pact would elevate demography to the status of a strategic priority. It would establish shared benchmarks to track progress on demographic adaptation, for example, improvements in fertility rates, the stabilisation of the old-age dependency ratio, or metrics related to migrant integration. The pact would provide a framework for aligning national policies and encourage reforms that go beyond short-term popularity in favour of long-term sustainability. 

Another essential pillar of this shared approach would be the horizontal integration of demographic considerations into all EU policies. Currently, demography appears only sporadically and retroactively in impact assessments – within education, agriculture, or cohesion policy, for instance. In the future, every major EU strategy, from industrial policy to healthcare, from digital transition to regional development, should assess how it affects population structure and responds to ageing, emigration, or declining birth rates. 

The pact would represent more than technical cooperation; it would serve as a political declaration that demography is not a secondary issue for the EU but a central one. Strategic autonomy does not only mean energy independence or technological self-sufficiency; it also implies population security – the capacity for Europe to maintain its economy, social model, and political relevance through the strength of its own citizens. 

Mainstreaming demography into EU strategic planning 

A liberal strategy starts from the premise that demography must be integrated as a horizontal factor across the entire EU policy and planning framework – just as has already occurred in the cases of climate change and digital transformation. Population-related aspects must appear not only in social or educational policy but across every area that directly affects citizens’ living conditions, mobility, learning opportunities, and regional equality. 

One of the most important tools in this regard is the European Semester, the EU’s annual coordination mechanism, which aligns national budgets, structural reforms, and investment priorities. Currently, demographic analysis plays only a minor role in this process. Yet assessing a country’s long-term fiscal sustainability, productivity, and labour market outlook is incomplete without factoring in demographic trends. 

In the field of industrial policy and skills development, the lack of demographic considerations is especially striking. Technological innovation and digitalisation are valuable not in and of themselves, but only if people are able to apply and benefit from them. As the working-age population declines, maintaining productivity will increasingly depend on upgrading the skills and capabilities of the existing workforce – a challenge that is inherently demographic in nature. 

To truly embed demographic thinking in EU planning, there must be institutional capacity-building. The European Commission and other EU bodies should develop an analytical and impact assessment framework that evaluates all significant regulatory and budgetary decisions from a demographic perspective. This would not be without precedent: the EU already requires climate and digital impact assessments across many policy areas. A similar demographic impact assessment, introduced as a new regulation or guideline, would represent a major step towards long-term planning and coherence. 

Appointment of a Commissioner for Demographic Sustainability

In the current institutional architecture of the EU, several horizontal challenges – such as climate change, the digital transition, and geopolitical security – are assigned to dedicated commissioners or vice-presidents, giving these issues the visibility and authority they deserve. Demographic challenges, by contrast, are fragmented across portfolios such as employment, social rights, cohesion, and education and are often treated as secondary concerns. In the European Commission in 2019, Dubravka Šuica’s official post included the field of demography (Vice-President of the European Commission for Democracy and Demography) (European Commission, n.d.) alongside her main position as a Commissioner for the Mediterranean), and this continued in 2024, despite the fact that it would be worthy of a separate position. 

This institutional fragmentation reflects not only a lack of strategic focus but also the absence of a comprehensive and politically empowered EU demographic strategy. Yet managing population decline can no longer be seen as a purely technocratic matter. Its political significance has been underscored by recent societal transformations, voter anxieties, and the rise of populist discourse. For the next European Commission, it would be both timely and appropriate to appoint a dedicated Commissioner for Demographic Sustainability. 

This role would serve three main functions. Firstly, it would enable the horizontal coordination of a unified EU demographic strategy. A dedicated commissioner could ensure coherence across policy areas such as education, migration, family policy, regional development, and pensions. Secondly, the commissioner would represent demographic priorities within institutional negotiations, including in the formulation of Multiannual Financial Frameworks, programming cycles, and legislative packages. Thirdly, the role would provide a platform for strategic dialogue with Member States, expert communities, civil society organisations, and citizen forums. 

Such a position would not only fulfil a practical coordination role – it would also carry symbolic significance. It would send a clear political message: the EU recognises that demography is not a secondary issue but an existential challenge that shapes the continent’s future, prosperity, and global role. Appointing such a commissioner would signal that the EU is not merely reacting to demographic trends but is prepared to actively shape them through deliberate, values-based, and long-term policymaking. This role would also help ensure that Europe’s demographic strategy evolves from a fragmented collection of programmes into a coherent narrative capable of aligning economic, social, and political goals under a unified vision for the future. 

Establishing a European Demographic Transition Fund

The EU’s structural and cohesion funds – owing to their historical mandate – have primarily focused on reducing economic disparities, balancing regional development, and supporting the convergence of disadvantaged areas. While these objectives partially overlap with demographic challenges, the existing EU funding instruments have not been suitable for directly and specifically addressing the structural problems stemming from population decline.  

This is why the creation of a dedicated and targeted financial mechanism is necessary: a European Demographic Transition Fund that would specifically support ageing, depopulating, or structurally declining regions.³ The logic behind such a fund would not be one of social redistribution, but rather one of enhancing demographic adaptability – incentivising Member States and regions to respond to demographic challenges in a proactive, innovative, and sustainable manner. 

Such a fund could serve multiple objectives. On the one hand, it could finance region-specific investments aimed at retaining or attracting young people: housing programmes, support for young entrepreneurs, expansion of childcare infrastructure, development of digital connectivity, and the creation of flexible work and training opportunities. On the other hand, it could support innovative demographic pilot projects that experiment with new methods and partnership models to curb population decline. 

Creating this fund would not be without precedent. The EU has already established targeted transition or crisis-related funding mechanisms, such as the Just Transition Fund for managing the social effects of the green transition, or the Recovery and Resilience Facility post-COVID. The demographic challenge is of similar weight – albeit less visible – and in the long run may prove even more destabilising. Therefore, the operation of such a fund must be flexible, regionally tailored, and designed in close cooperation with local governments, civil society organisations, businesses, and educational institutions. 

From a political perspective, the creation of this fund would be both a symbolic and a strategic statement, especially if initiated by liberal political actors. It would demonstrate that the EU is willing to mobilise resources to maintain a sustainable and viable social structure across the entire continent, not just in competitive urban centres but also in vulnerable peripheral regions. Such a funding tool would not only advance cohesion objectives but would also strengthen the human dimension of Europe’s strategic autonomy: the European project needs people – and those people must have places to live and the means to thrive within Europe. 

References 

• Bloom, D.E. (ed.) (2019). Live Long And Prosper? The Economics of Ageing Populations. London: Center for Economic Policy Research. https://content.sph.harvard.edu/wwwhsph/sites/1288/2019/10/2019-10_Bloom_VoxEU-eBook_Live-long-and-prosper_The-economics-of-ageing-populations.pdf. 
• ESPON. (2020). ‘European Shrinking Rural Areas: Challenges, Actions and Perspectives for Territorial Governance – Final Report’. https://archive.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ESPON%20ESCAPE%20Main%20Final%20Report.pdf. 
• Eurofound. (n.d.). ‘NEETs – Young People Not in Employment, Education or Training’. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/topic/neets. 
• European Commission. (2019). ‘The Impact of Demographic Change in Europe’. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/new-push-european-democracy/impact-demographic-change-europe_en#impacts-of-demographic-change. 
• European Commission. (2021a). ‘Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027)’. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital/education-action-plan. 
• European Commission. (2021b). ‘The 2021 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2019–2070)’. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/2021-ageing-report-economic-and-budgetary-projections-eu-member-states-2019-2070_en  
• European Commission. (2023a). ‘Cohesion Report Highlights Need to Adapt Policies to Changing Demographics’. Panorama, 1 March. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/whats-new/panorama/2023/03/03-01-2023-cohesion-report-highlights-need-to-adapt-policies-to-changing-demographics_en. 
• European Commission. (2023b). ‘The Impact of Demographic Change in a Changing Environment’. January, https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-01/Demography_report_2022_0.pdf. 
• European Commission. (2024). ‘The Draghi Report on EU Competitiveness’. 9 September. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/draghi-report_en#paragraph_47059. 
• European Commission. (n.d.). ‘Vice-President Dubravka Šuica – Democracy and Demography’. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/suica_en. 
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. (2021). 2021 Pension Adequacy Report: Current and Future Income Adequacy in Old Age in the EU, Volume 1. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4ee6cadd-cd83-11eb-ac72-01aa75ed71a1. 
• European Parliament. (2022). ‘Question Time: Tackling Depopulation through Cohesion Policy Instruments’. Plenary – October. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2022/733674/EPRS_ATA(2022)733674_EN.pdf. 
• Eurostat. (2023). ‘Demography of Europe – 2023 Edition’. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/interactive-publications/demography-2023. 
• Eurostat. (2024). ‘Statistics on Young People Neither in Employment nor in Education or Training’. May. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Statistics_on_young_people_neither_in_employment_nor_in_education_or_training. 
• García-Herrero, A., & Porcaro, G. (2021). ‘Online Education and the European Digital Lag’. Bruegel. 
• International Labour Organization (ILO). (2018). ‘Supporting Longer Working Lives’. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_713371.pdf 
• Mallia, C. (2012). ‘EU Pact on Demographic Changes’. Times of Malta, 21 November. https://timesofmalta.com/article/EU-pact-on-demographic-changes.446383. 
• OECD. (2023). ‘Pensions at a Glance 2023’. 13 December. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pensions-at-a-glance-2023_678055dd-en.html. 
• United Nations. (2024). ‘World Population Prospects 2024’. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wpp. 
• World Bank. (2016). ‘Live Long and Prosper: Aging in East Asia and Pacific’. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/23133.